<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Let Ideas Simmer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://xfep.com/blogging/let-ideas-simmer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://xfep.com/blogging/let-ideas-simmer/</link>
	<description>Tips on Being a Better Blogger</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 12:14:41 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: zania</title>
		<link>http://xfep.com/blogging/let-ideas-simmer/comment-page-1/#comment-1580</link>
		<dc:creator>zania</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 02:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xfep.com/?p=536#comment-1580</guid>
		<description>I think you are absolutely right about the most resource-full posts being from those who have waited, researched and thought a while.  But it does  depend on the blog in question.  TechCrunch cannot really hang about too long with posting about new ideas. There are plenty out there who would love to take their place as leaders in their  particular blogging field.
Kevin&#039;s idea looks like it could be the best way forward - a disclaimer.  Of course, even if you did that too often whilst giving the wrong info it wouldn&#039;t work.
It&#039;s a mine field isn&#039;t it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you are absolutely right about the most resource-full posts being from those who have waited, researched and thought a while.  But it does  depend on the blog in question.  TechCrunch cannot really hang about too long with posting about new ideas. There are plenty out there who would love to take their place as leaders in their  particular blogging field.<br />
Kevin&#8217;s idea looks like it could be the best way forward &#8211; a disclaimer.  Of course, even if you did that too often whilst giving the wrong info it wouldn&#8217;t work.<br />
It&#8217;s a mine field isn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://xfep.com/blogging/let-ideas-simmer/comment-page-1/#comment-1575</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 12:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xfep.com/?p=536#comment-1575</guid>
		<description>I think you are right however I do think that there is still benefit from reporting a news story first. You just need to make sure you tell readers that you are not 100% sure if the story or report is correct yet. Although, if you made a habit of reporting stories that turned out to be false I&#039;m sure you would learn to simmer anc check stories before you comment on them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you are right however I do think that there is still benefit from reporting a news story first. You just need to make sure you tell readers that you are not 100% sure if the story or report is correct yet. Although, if you made a habit of reporting stories that turned out to be false I&#8217;m sure you would learn to simmer anc check stories before you comment on them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
