<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Google Getting Soft on Paid Links</title>
	<atom:link href="http://xfep.com/feature/is-google-getting-soft-on-paid-links/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://xfep.com/feature/is-google-getting-soft-on-paid-links/</link>
	<description>Tips on Being a Better Blogger</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 12:14:41 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kate</title>
		<link>http://xfep.com/feature/is-google-getting-soft-on-paid-links/comment-page-1/#comment-1324</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 22:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xfep.com/feature/is-google-getting-soft-on-paid-links/#comment-1324</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve given up trying to understand the ways of Google. One of my blogs was a PR5 and got reduced to a PR3 a year ago due to paid links. (It has 5500+ incoming links, so that&#039;s particularly infuriating.) One of my blogs on which I don&#039;t do paid reviews at all has a mere 38 incoming links but went from PR0 to PR3. Where is the sense?

Although I find Google indispensable and quite possible the best thing to ever happen to the internet, I&#039;ve been online long enough to believe that everyone should have their opportunity to make money online in their own fashion. If people are accepting money for links and turning out quality content that&#039;s relevant to the inserted link (paid or not) then it makes no sense for Google to penalize them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve given up trying to understand the ways of Google. One of my blogs was a PR5 and got reduced to a PR3 a year ago due to paid links. (It has 5500+ incoming links, so that&#8217;s particularly infuriating.) One of my blogs on which I don&#8217;t do paid reviews at all has a mere 38 incoming links but went from PR0 to PR3. Where is the sense?</p>
<p>Although I find Google indispensable and quite possible the best thing to ever happen to the internet, I&#8217;ve been online long enough to believe that everyone should have their opportunity to make money online in their own fashion. If people are accepting money for links and turning out quality content that&#8217;s relevant to the inserted link (paid or not) then it makes no sense for Google to penalize them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tammy</title>
		<link>http://xfep.com/feature/is-google-getting-soft-on-paid-links/comment-page-1/#comment-1322</link>
		<dc:creator>Tammy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 12:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xfep.com/feature/is-google-getting-soft-on-paid-links/#comment-1322</guid>
		<description>I just about crapped myself when I went to my site and my blog is now a PR2. And my other blog, is a PR3...
I kept checking - to see if it was a fluke... but today - it&#039;s still the same.
Strange....freakin strange...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just about crapped myself when I went to my site and my blog is now a PR2. And my other blog, is a PR3&#8230;<br />
I kept checking &#8211; to see if it was a fluke&#8230; but today &#8211; it&#8217;s still the same.<br />
Strange&#8230;.freakin strange&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekend Links 05/02 &#124; PureBlogging</title>
		<link>http://xfep.com/feature/is-google-getting-soft-on-paid-links/comment-page-1/#comment-1316</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekend Links 05/02 &#124; PureBlogging</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 01:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xfep.com/feature/is-google-getting-soft-on-paid-links/#comment-1316</guid>
		<description>[...] eXtra For Every Publisher wonders if Google is getting soft. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] eXtra For Every Publisher wonders if Google is getting soft. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarbartha</title>
		<link>http://xfep.com/feature/is-google-getting-soft-on-paid-links/comment-page-1/#comment-1317</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarbartha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 01:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xfep.com/feature/is-google-getting-soft-on-paid-links/#comment-1317</guid>
		<description>Everybody should get chance to grow. Monopolistic nature is not competitive. When Google banned PayPerPost blogger and ranked back to ZERO, they came up with their own Ranking system IZEARank.
Always there is alternative solution. Due to splog real blogger&#039;s are suffering and for taking care this issue Google should take steps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everybody should get chance to grow. Monopolistic nature is not competitive. When Google banned PayPerPost blogger and ranked back to ZERO, they came up with their own Ranking system IZEARank.<br />
Always there is alternative solution. Due to splog real blogger&#8217;s are suffering and for taking care this issue Google should take steps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://xfep.com/feature/is-google-getting-soft-on-paid-links/comment-page-1/#comment-1315</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 13:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xfep.com/feature/is-google-getting-soft-on-paid-links/#comment-1315</guid>
		<description>Very good post Adnan.

I have said many times that many of googles stances on paid links are a method of pushing more business towards people using their adsense program (even though most websites get very little money from using them).

With regards to johnchow, I wrote a post about this last year. I think its a joke that searching for john chow did not return johnchow.com as the first result. They were effectively returning a poor search result to the searcher (and this is always their main argument when applying penalties). I guess it&#039;s difficult for them to penalize a website without providing poorer search results as well.

I don&#039;t think that the recent update means that google has gone soft on paid links. Taking johnchow again for an example, the number of subscribers has more than doubled since the last time their was an update so no doubt there are thousands of more backlinks to his site therefore even with a penalty his PR should still have increased.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good post Adnan.</p>
<p>I have said many times that many of googles stances on paid links are a method of pushing more business towards people using their adsense program (even though most websites get very little money from using them).</p>
<p>With regards to johnchow, I wrote a post about this last year. I think its a joke that searching for john chow did not return johnchow.com as the first result. They were effectively returning a poor search result to the searcher (and this is always their main argument when applying penalties). I guess it&#8217;s difficult for them to penalize a website without providing poorer search results as well.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think that the recent update means that google has gone soft on paid links. Taking johnchow again for an example, the number of subscribers has more than doubled since the last time their was an update so no doubt there are thousands of more backlinks to his site therefore even with a penalty his PR should still have increased.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
