<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Understanding Search Engine Penalties</title>
	<atom:link href="http://xfep.com/feature/understanding-search-engine-penalties/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://xfep.com/feature/understanding-search-engine-penalties/</link>
	<description>Tips on Being a Better Blogger</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 12:14:41 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Believe. Act. Achieve! - dcr Blogs dot Com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 50 of the World&#8217;s Greatest Blogging Links</title>
		<link>http://xfep.com/feature/understanding-search-engine-penalties/comment-page-1/#comment-822</link>
		<dc:creator>Believe. Act. Achieve! - dcr Blogs dot Com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 50 of the World&#8217;s Greatest Blogging Links</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 13:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xfep.com/google/understanding-search-engine-penalties/#comment-822</guid>
		<description>[...] Understanding Search Engine Penalties - At which point did this list become cynical? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Understanding Search Engine Penalties &#8211; At which point did this list become cynical? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekend Notes &#124; College-Startup</title>
		<link>http://xfep.com/feature/understanding-search-engine-penalties/comment-page-1/#comment-815</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekend Notes &#124; College-Startup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 15:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xfep.com/google/understanding-search-engine-penalties/#comment-815</guid>
		<description>[...] over at the great eXtra For Every Publisher blog did a fantastic analysis of why my celeb blog, Celebrity Cowboy, might be getting penalized in the GOOG [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] over at the great eXtra For Every Publisher blog did a fantastic analysis of why my celeb blog, Celebrity Cowboy, might be getting penalized in the GOOG [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PiticStyle</title>
		<link>http://xfep.com/feature/understanding-search-engine-penalties/comment-page-1/#comment-813</link>
		<dc:creator>PiticStyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 13:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xfep.com/google/understanding-search-engine-penalties/#comment-813</guid>
		<description>Great post, thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Gaulard Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Network Solutions, Adobe Photoshop, Profy and Google</title>
		<link>http://xfep.com/feature/understanding-search-engine-penalties/comment-page-1/#comment-812</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Gaulard Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Network Solutions, Adobe Photoshop, Profy and Google</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 02:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xfep.com/google/understanding-search-engine-penalties/#comment-812</guid>
		<description>[...] Understanding Search Engine Penalties [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Understanding Search Engine Penalties [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catto</title>
		<link>http://xfep.com/feature/understanding-search-engine-penalties/comment-page-1/#comment-817</link>
		<dc:creator>Catto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 15:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xfep.com/google/understanding-search-engine-penalties/#comment-817</guid>
		<description>Hey now,
NIce post very informative.
Thx 4 the info,
Catto</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey now,<br />
NIce post very informative.<br />
Thx 4 the info,<br />
Catto</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Small Traffic Boost From Digg - eXtra For Every Publisher</title>
		<link>http://xfep.com/feature/understanding-search-engine-penalties/comment-page-1/#comment-816</link>
		<dc:creator>Small Traffic Boost From Digg - eXtra For Every Publisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 00:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xfep.com/google/understanding-search-engine-penalties/#comment-816</guid>
		<description>[...] story was Understanding Search Engine Penalties, and it has received over 300 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] story was Understanding Search Engine Penalties, and it has received over 300 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://xfep.com/feature/understanding-search-engine-penalties/comment-page-1/#comment-821</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 16:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xfep.com/google/understanding-search-engine-penalties/#comment-821</guid>
		<description>Erica - While I would like to believe you, I have seen more than half a dozen sites incorrectly marked badware, with no links to malware nor any malware hosted on the site.

And since neither stopbadware nor Google have made it apparent what the determining factors are, I have to believe that there is something else going on that gets a site listed as such.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erica &#8211; While I would like to believe you, I have seen more than half a dozen sites incorrectly marked badware, with no links to malware nor any malware hosted on the site.</p>
<p>And since neither stopbadware nor Google have made it apparent what the determining factors are, I have to believe that there is something else going on that gets a site listed as such.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erica George</title>
		<link>http://xfep.com/feature/understanding-search-engine-penalties/comment-page-1/#comment-820</link>
		<dc:creator>Erica George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 16:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xfep.com/google/understanding-search-engine-penalties/#comment-820</guid>
		<description>Hi David,

Your advice on content optimization is spot on. I do want to clear up one thing though. You said that &lt;em&gt;&quot;Sometimes sites get listed on stopbadware.org just because their JavaScript doesn’t work correctly, or advertising doesn’t load properly.&quot;&lt;/em&gt; As a representative of StopBadware, I want to assure you and your readers that that is not the case. At present, the badware sites listed in StopBadware&#039;s Clearinghouse are all independently flagged by Google, and Google is responsible for placing warnings for malware in its own search results. Google&#039;s determinations are entirely based on its findings of badware, links to badware, or badware-distributing code such as exploits. While simply poorly coded or poorly validated sites may lose some points from Google (I can&#039;t speak to their normal search algorithms at all), that would never alone be a cause for a badware warning.

We have more information about the warnings, and StopBadware&#039;s involvement, here:
http://www.stopbadware.org/home/faq#partnerwarnings

Erica
StopBadware staff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi David,</p>
<p>Your advice on content optimization is spot on. I do want to clear up one thing though. You said that <em>&#8220;Sometimes sites get listed on stopbadware.org just because their JavaScript doesn’t work correctly, or advertising doesn’t load properly.&#8221;</em> As a representative of StopBadware, I want to assure you and your readers that that is not the case. At present, the badware sites listed in StopBadware&#8217;s Clearinghouse are all independently flagged by Google, and Google is responsible for placing warnings for malware in its own search results. Google&#8217;s determinations are entirely based on its findings of badware, links to badware, or badware-distributing code such as exploits. While simply poorly coded or poorly validated sites may lose some points from Google (I can&#8217;t speak to their normal search algorithms at all), that would never alone be a cause for a badware warning.</p>
<p>We have more information about the warnings, and StopBadware&#8217;s involvement, here:<br />
<a href="http://www.stopbadware.org/home/faq#partnerwarnings" rel="nofollow">http://www.stopbadware.org/home/faq#partnerwarnings</a></p>
<p>Erica<br />
StopBadware staff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://xfep.com/feature/understanding-search-engine-penalties/comment-page-1/#comment-811</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 12:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xfep.com/google/understanding-search-engine-penalties/#comment-811</guid>
		<description>Great article!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SMASHINGAPPS.COM</title>
		<link>http://xfep.com/feature/understanding-search-engine-penalties/comment-page-1/#comment-810</link>
		<dc:creator>SMASHINGAPPS.COM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 11:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xfep.com/google/understanding-search-engine-penalties/#comment-810</guid>
		<description>Great review.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great review.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
