<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I Don&#8217;t Work For Myself</title>
	<atom:link href="http://xfep.com/problogging/i-dont-work-for-myself/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://xfep.com/problogging/i-dont-work-for-myself/</link>
	<description>Tips on Being a Better Blogger</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:53:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonson roth</title>
		<link>http://xfep.com/problogging/i-dont-work-for-myself/comment-page-1/#comment-1683</link>
		<dc:creator>jonson roth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 07:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xfep.com/?p=580#comment-1683</guid>
		<description>As with a lot of things, blogs as a collective probably follow a &quot;bell curve&quot; in terms of earnings. There&#039;ll be a big lump (bell) in the center, showing that the &quot;center&quot; of the collective probably earn $X/mth on avg. To the left ( X) of the lump, there&#039;s everyone else. However, it&#039;s possible that for blogs, the curve is skewed to the right -- i.e., majority of blogs fall below the lump. (To the right because it means far fewer blogs earn enough to support a full-time income.)

So that&#039;s supports your implied theory: most people who earn a living online doing something either directly or indirectly related to blogs probably do so working for someone else. They&#039;d have to be, if the bell curve is truly in effect. The bell curve would suggest that the average blogger isn&#039;t earning all that much and if they want an online career, they&#039;ll be working for one of the blogs that is earning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As with a lot of things, blogs as a collective probably follow a &#8220;bell curve&#8221; in terms of earnings. There&#8217;ll be a big lump (bell) in the center, showing that the &#8220;center&#8221; of the collective probably earn $X/mth on avg. To the left ( X) of the lump, there&#8217;s everyone else. However, it&#8217;s possible that for blogs, the curve is skewed to the right &#8212; i.e., majority of blogs fall below the lump. (To the right because it means far fewer blogs earn enough to support a full-time income.)</p>
<p>So that&#8217;s supports your implied theory: most people who earn a living online doing something either directly or indirectly related to blogs probably do so working for someone else. They&#8217;d have to be, if the bell curve is truly in effect. The bell curve would suggest that the average blogger isn&#8217;t earning all that much and if they want an online career, they&#8217;ll be working for one of the blogs that is earning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Votre</title>
		<link>http://xfep.com/problogging/i-dont-work-for-myself/comment-page-1/#comment-1656</link>
		<dc:creator>Votre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 18:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xfep.com/?p=580#comment-1656</guid>
		<description>Who was it that once said &quot;Being self-employed is just like having a job. The only difference is that the hours are longer and the benefits are worse.&quot; ???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who was it that once said &#8220;Being self-employed is just like having a job. The only difference is that the hours are longer and the benefits are worse.&#8221; ???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

