<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s Going on With Alexa?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://xfep.com/promotion/whats-going-on-with-alexa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://xfep.com/promotion/whats-going-on-with-alexa/</link>
	<description>Tips on Being a Better Blogger</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:53:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: stonemonkey45</title>
		<link>http://xfep.com/promotion/whats-going-on-with-alexa/comment-page-1/#comment-2595</link>
		<dc:creator>stonemonkey45</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 03:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xfep.com/?p=725#comment-2595</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m pretty sure those sites would have had vastly inflated rankings due to webmasters being far more likely to have Alexa&#039;s toolbar installed than normal members of the public. So while I don&#039;t have any idea how accurate Alexa is overall, It probably gives a more accurate &quot;rough guide&quot;  to how popular those sites are in comparison with the web in general.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure those sites would have had vastly inflated rankings due to webmasters being far more likely to have Alexa&#8217;s toolbar installed than normal members of the public. So while I don&#8217;t have any idea how accurate Alexa is overall, It probably gives a more accurate &#8220;rough guide&#8221;  to how popular those sites are in comparison with the web in general.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eXtra For Every Publisher &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Alexa Rank Frustrations</title>
		<link>http://xfep.com/promotion/whats-going-on-with-alexa/comment-page-1/#comment-2448</link>
		<dc:creator>eXtra For Every Publisher &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Alexa Rank Frustrations</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 02:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xfep.com/?p=725#comment-2448</guid>
		<description>[...] really wish I understood exactly what went into creating a better Alexa rank. Yes, I want to manipulate my rank, but in what is considered a &#8220;white hat&#8221; way by attracting the type of traffic that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] really wish I understood exactly what went into creating a better Alexa rank. Yes, I want to manipulate my rank, but in what is considered a &#8220;white hat&#8221; way by attracting the type of traffic that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Muhammad Riduan Ramli</title>
		<link>http://xfep.com/promotion/whats-going-on-with-alexa/comment-page-1/#comment-2185</link>
		<dc:creator>Muhammad Riduan Ramli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 03:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xfep.com/?p=725#comment-2185</guid>
		<description>Oh man.. Alexa do need a lot of work to improve its ranking system. As right now, I couldn&#039;t care less what it gives in its ranking anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh man.. Alexa do need a lot of work to improve its ranking system. As right now, I couldn&#8217;t care less what it gives in its ranking anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Peralty</title>
		<link>http://xfep.com/promotion/whats-going-on-with-alexa/comment-page-1/#comment-2181</link>
		<dc:creator>David Peralty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 15:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xfep.com/?p=725#comment-2181</guid>
		<description>Right, so the post was basically a plea for those that use Alexa as a ranking factor to remember that it is only a guide and not as bang on as it should hopefully be, especially when comparing sites from different niches. :)

I have to admit though, I do see a lot less sites dominating the Alexa rankings through the simple manipulation techniques that were common a year ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right, so the post was basically a plea for those that use Alexa as a ranking factor to remember that it is only a guide and not as bang on as it should hopefully be, especially when comparing sites from different niches. <img src='http://xfep.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I have to admit though, I do see a lot less sites dominating the Alexa rankings through the simple manipulation techniques that were common a year ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://xfep.com/promotion/whats-going-on-with-alexa/comment-page-1/#comment-2180</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 14:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xfep.com/?p=725#comment-2180</guid>
		<description>I agree with you, Alexa has loads of work to do. I have always hated Alexa with a passion but compared to what it used to be like I do think that they are better.

That being said, it&#039;s very difficult to get any two stats scripts to work. My webalizer stats are different from my analytics stats which are different from my awstats. I&#039;ve always been surprised how scripts which are installed on the same server can produce such contrasting results.

With regards to the Alexa ratings going down, I can see what you&#039;re saying. As I said, even though Alexa ratings are a little better, they&#039;re still shouldn&#039;t be considered more than a just a rough guide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you, Alexa has loads of work to do. I have always hated Alexa with a passion but compared to what it used to be like I do think that they are better.</p>
<p>That being said, it&#8217;s very difficult to get any two stats scripts to work. My webalizer stats are different from my analytics stats which are different from my awstats. I&#8217;ve always been surprised how scripts which are installed on the same server can produce such contrasting results.</p>
<p>With regards to the Alexa ratings going down, I can see what you&#8217;re saying. As I said, even though Alexa ratings are a little better, they&#8217;re still shouldn&#8217;t be considered more than a just a rough guide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Peralty</title>
		<link>http://xfep.com/promotion/whats-going-on-with-alexa/comment-page-1/#comment-2179</link>
		<dc:creator>David Peralty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 14:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xfep.com/?p=725#comment-2179</guid>
		<description>I am saying that the rankings can&#039;t entirely be based on traffic. I am also saying that each of these blogs have been effected negatively, but not at the same scale or speed. I am saying that Alexa is causing issues for myself and these sites when being ranked by Alexa score against others.

A good example for me on how messed up Alexa is would be Performancing.com compared to this blog. I know for a fact that this blog has less traffic than Performancing, so why is their Alexa rank not as good as mine? 

All sites weren&#039;t effected equally by the new data that Alexa took in and that&#039;s what bothers me. 

I think Alexa should be more transparent when it comes to what criteria they are using to rank people, or where their data is coming from. 

Also, I guess I would ask, do you think Problogger.net&#039;s current ranking is more in line with its overall position in the blogosphere? Do you really think it deserves to be 60,000 from the top? 

I think Alexa still has a lot of work to do on fine tuning their ranking system, or people that depend on Alexa rankings for their software, should devalue the rankings further so that other factors like back links are given more of a priority.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am saying that the rankings can&#8217;t entirely be based on traffic. I am also saying that each of these blogs have been effected negatively, but not at the same scale or speed. I am saying that Alexa is causing issues for myself and these sites when being ranked by Alexa score against others.</p>
<p>A good example for me on how messed up Alexa is would be Performancing.com compared to this blog. I know for a fact that this blog has less traffic than Performancing, so why is their Alexa rank not as good as mine? </p>
<p>All sites weren&#8217;t effected equally by the new data that Alexa took in and that&#8217;s what bothers me. </p>
<p>I think Alexa should be more transparent when it comes to what criteria they are using to rank people, or where their data is coming from. </p>
<p>Also, I guess I would ask, do you think Problogger.net&#8217;s current ranking is more in line with its overall position in the blogosphere? Do you really think it deserves to be 60,000 from the top? </p>
<p>I think Alexa still has a lot of work to do on fine tuning their ranking system, or people that depend on Alexa rankings for their software, should devalue the rankings further so that other factors like back links are given more of a priority.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://xfep.com/promotion/whats-going-on-with-alexa/comment-page-1/#comment-2178</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 14:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xfep.com/?p=725#comment-2178</guid>
		<description>I agree, I don&#039;t think it&#039;s accurate however it is better than what it used to be. I used to have a site which had 4 times the traffic as my blog yet it was hundreds od thousands less on alexa.

I&#039;m a bit confused by your post then if you knew about the announcement. Alexa&#039;s system before was notorius for giving higher scores to web development type sites and when they changed their algorithm for working out the alexa score of a site web development sites were hurt the most because they were originally overinflated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s accurate however it is better than what it used to be. I used to have a site which had 4 times the traffic as my blog yet it was hundreds od thousands less on alexa.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a bit confused by your post then if you knew about the announcement. Alexa&#8217;s system before was notorius for giving higher scores to web development type sites and when they changed their algorithm for working out the alexa score of a site web development sites were hurt the most because they were originally overinflated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Peralty</title>
		<link>http://xfep.com/promotion/whats-going-on-with-alexa/comment-page-1/#comment-2177</link>
		<dc:creator>David Peralty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 13:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xfep.com/?p=725#comment-2177</guid>
		<description>Yes, I remember the announcement, and I remember the change in data sources and whatnot, but I disagree that they are more accurate. I would love to know what basic stats go into creating their ranking. Is it just traffic? If so, their system is still highly flawed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I remember the announcement, and I remember the change in data sources and whatnot, but I disagree that they are more accurate. I would love to know what basic stats go into creating their ranking. Is it just traffic? If so, their system is still highly flawed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://xfep.com/promotion/whats-going-on-with-alexa/comment-page-1/#comment-2176</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 11:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xfep.com/?p=725#comment-2176</guid>
		<description>The Alexa ratings system was &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bloggingtips.com/2008/04/17/alexa-improve-rankings-system/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;improved in April 2008&lt;/a&gt; and in my opinion it&#039;s much more accurate, compared to what it was anyways. Because of this everyones Alexa rank dropped (apart from the ones closer to the top). 


Check out the announcement : http://www.alexa.com/site/company/announcement

:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Alexa ratings system was <a href="http://www.bloggingtips.com/2008/04/17/alexa-improve-rankings-system/" rel="nofollow">improved in April 2008</a> and in my opinion it&#8217;s much more accurate, compared to what it was anyways. Because of this everyones Alexa rank dropped (apart from the ones closer to the top). </p>
<p>Check out the announcement : <a href="http://www.alexa.com/site/company/announcement" rel="nofollow">http://www.alexa.com/site/company/announcement</a><br />
 <img src='http://xfep.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

