<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Basics of WordPress: Permalinks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://xfep.com/wordpress/the-basics-of-wordpress-permalinks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://xfep.com/wordpress/the-basics-of-wordpress-permalinks/</link>
	<description>Tips on Being a Better Blogger</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:53:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DeFries</title>
		<link>http://xfep.com/wordpress/the-basics-of-wordpress-permalinks/comment-page-1/#comment-823</link>
		<dc:creator>DeFries</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 15:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xfep.com/wordpress/the-basics-of-wordpress-permalinks/#comment-823</guid>
		<description>I agree with adding the &#039;year-part&#039;. I have heard people say the same thing about great articles and such, but I myself would like to see the relevancy as to age instantly.

I can understand though why the developers went with the default permalink structure as is, because the chosen option will work on any server kind: Apache &amp; Windows. The pretty permalink structure is a bit harder to get right on a windows server so the choice they made makes sense to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with adding the &#8216;year-part&#8217;. I have heard people say the same thing about great articles and such, but I myself would like to see the relevancy as to age instantly.</p>
<p>I can understand though why the developers went with the default permalink structure as is, because the chosen option will work on any server kind: Apache &amp; Windows. The pretty permalink structure is a bit harder to get right on a windows server so the choice they made makes sense to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne Liew</title>
		<link>http://xfep.com/wordpress/the-basics-of-wordpress-permalinks/comment-page-1/#comment-825</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Liew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xfep.com/wordpress/the-basics-of-wordpress-permalinks/#comment-825</guid>
		<description>I go with the post name as permalinks option, which is the custom one as shown in this post.

Numerical permalink just won&#039;t give any sense to the search engine of what your post is about and as Jason, I don&#039;t understand why Wordpress developers used it as the default form.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I go with the post name as permalinks option, which is the custom one as shown in this post.</p>
<p>Numerical permalink just won&#8217;t give any sense to the search engine of what your post is about and as Jason, I don&#8217;t understand why WordPress developers used it as the default form.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://xfep.com/wordpress/the-basics-of-wordpress-permalinks/comment-page-1/#comment-824</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 02:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xfep.com/wordpress/the-basics-of-wordpress-permalinks/#comment-824</guid>
		<description>Yea I see so many sites out there there are still using the default permalink structure.  What I can&#039;t understand is why the developers of WordPress don&#039;t at least make the default the post title?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea I see so many sites out there there are still using the default permalink structure.  What I can&#8217;t understand is why the developers of WordPress don&#8217;t at least make the default the post title?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

